圖書館學與資訊科學
Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/141
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item 筆記王振鵠教授幾個圖書資訊學的重要學術思維(國立台灣師範大學圖書資訊研究所, 2005-10-??) 吳美美; Mei-Mei Wu本文從年代及主題分析王振鵠教授的學術生涯及重要著作,並從王振鵠教授的學術書寫中,摘記王振鵠教授的重要學術論述。Item Information Science(國立台灣師範大學圖書資訊研究所, 2009-04-??) Bing WangThe nature of information science (IS) as a discipline has been a matter of dispute almost since the day it was created. What is less controversial is the interdisciplinary nature of the IS field, which has close relationships with such fields as librarianship/library science, computing disciplines, communication, and cognitive science. Since 1990s, with the rapid development and widespread application of computing and information technologies, especially the Internet and WWW, the nature, territory and education of the IS field has been constantly changing, and is increasingly tied to Internet-based technologies and connected to knowledge management and data mining. The relationships between IS and computing disciplines are becoming more complicated than ever. In this paper the similarities and differences between IS, computer science, information systems, and information technology field are examined in terms of their definitions, major research topics, primary foci, practice areas for professionals, and educations. The purpose of this paper is to provide some insights into the essence and roles of IS in contemporary academic community.Item 圖書資訊學知識來源與知識擴散指標之研究(國立台灣師範大學圖書資訊研究所, 2009-10-??) 黃慕萱; 何蕙菩本文以1997 年至2006 年圖書資訊學之引用文獻與被引用文獻作為分析對象,除研究圖書資訊學知識來源與知識擴散程度外,並探討四種知識來源與知識擴散指標之差異性與適用性,包括 COC、WCOC、Brillouin’s Index、Originality/Generality。本文發現,圖書資訊學知識來源程度較知識擴散程度高。圖書資訊學知識來源的學科自我引用率逐 漸降低,而知識擴散仍以學科境內擴散為主,但與過去研究結果相比,對其他學科影響逐漸提高。在各指標比較上,COC 與WCOC著重跨學科引用程度,兩指標相關性極高,相互取代性大;Brillouin’s Index 易受樣本特性影響,適用於衡量分類較細之專利號或學科;Originality/Generality 則適用於衡量分類較粗之學科。Item 圖書資訊學研究的另一取向(國立台灣師範大學圖書資訊研究所, 2000-04-??) 王美鴻; Mei-Hung Wang詮釋學在80年代中期開始受到圖書資訊學者的注意,到了90年代初期,已成為頗 受重視的研究取向。本文的主旨,在思考詮釋學於圖書資訊學的崛起與啟示:文中,首先探 索詮釋學成為圖書資訊學研究取向的綠由,其次介紹詮釋學的發展過程,最後陳述個人對詮 釋學帶予圖書資訊學研究與教育者的思考。