師大學報
Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/169
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item 我國與美國小學數學教育比較研究(國立臺灣師範大學研究發展處, 1986-06-??) 陳梅生; 吳德邦The main purpose of this study is focused upon a comparison study between the curriculum and teaching materials of mathematics education of the 1 st-to-6th-grade elementary schools in USA and those in the ROC. From the study, the researcher wishes to find out the differences concerned and the feature and progress of this aspect in USA so as to adept them as a valuable reference for us in the ROC. The information presented in this study is the "Mathematics Objective" published by Boston Public Elementary School Systems. After a comparison study, several conclusions and suggestions are made as follows: 1. Concerning the method of stating the outline of the content, USA adopts "behavioral objectives", which is still, absent in Taiwan, and therefore worthy to be noted as a future direction. 2. Their "problem solving" is identically our 'utilized problem' or 'word problem'. However, our word problem is quite problem-centered, 'but theirs extends to the field of daily lives. Such a method is surely a matter worthy of attention. 3. The Curriculum Objectives in USA are divided into "priority objectives" and "objec-tives". The former allows a common study for all students while the latter allows individual study for the fast-learning students. This is much needed in our country. 4. The heading of categories of the objectives in USA are as Numeration, Computation, Fraction, Decimal and Percentage, Estimation, Geometry and Measurement in the spiral pattern for development. If we are to improve our teaching materials and methods, the spiral curriculum pattern seems to be most likely feasible.Item 數學創意類比與同儕評量及其網路案例設計之初探(國立臺灣師範大學研究發展處, 2002-04-??) 徐雍智; 蔡今中; 陳明璋本研究之目的在於將創意、類比、與同儕評量的理念相結合,並以活動方式讓學生發揮數學創意類比聯想與同儕交互評量,以檢驗對於中學學生數學成就的影響。本研究採實驗研究法,實驗樣本取自新竹某中學二年級學生實驗組與對照組兩班各36人,實驗組進行了為期約一個月、四次活動、十道類比題目的學習活動。根據實驗結果分析,本研究有如下發現:一、在某些評分項目中(如創意性),同儕評比與專家評比間的相關係數不高,這也顯示學生評量分數與專家評量的分數有些差距。二、本實驗設計之活動對於學生的較高層次之數學應用題及分析題有顯著性幫助。本研究結果建議,學生在同儕互評與創意類比的過程中可促進學生較高層次的思考,並幫助學生建構較豐富之數學概念結構,也因此學生在較高層次的成就測驗題目中有較好之表現。