文學院

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/2

院成立於民國44年,歷經50餘年的銳意發展,目前設有國文、英文、歷史、地理、臺文等5個學系、翻譯和臺灣史2個獨立所,以及全球華人寫作中心和國際臺灣學研究中心。除臺史所僅設碩士班,其餘6個系所均設有碩、博士班;目前專兼任教師近250人,學生約2500餘人。

本院早期以培養優秀中學國文、英文、歷史和地理教師為鵠的,臺灣中學語文和史地教育的實踐與成功,本院提供不可磨滅的貢獻。近年來,本院隨師範體系轉型而調整發展方向,除維持中學師資培育的優勢外,也積極朝理論研究和實務操作等面向前進。目前,本院各系所師培生的教師檢定通過率平均在95%以上;非師培生在文化、傳播、文學、應用史學及環境災害、地理資訊系統等領域發展,也已卓然有成。

本院各系所教師的研究能量極為豐富,參與國內外學術活動相當活躍。根據論文數量、引用次數等指標所作的學術力評比,本院居人文領域全國第2名。各系所之間,無論是教師的教學與研究,或學生的生活與學習,都能相輔相成、榮辱與共,彼此渾然一體,足堪「為師、為範」而無愧。

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 19
  • Item
    推動地理奧林匹亞競賽的歷程與契機
    (中國地理學會, 2014-12-01) 沈淑敏; 張峻嘉 
  • Item
    臺灣饒平裔原鄉之歷史語言及地理意涵探討
    (國立高雄師範大學地理學系, 2014-12-01) 韋煙灶
    本研究嘗試透過地圖操作,以及整合歷史學、地理學及族譜等文獻的分析,梳理多數臺灣饒平裔家族之原鄉-元歌都(饒北地區)的歷史區域特色,並嘗試解析元歌都地域進入漢文化區的時程。具體操作上,利用族譜對比、整合元歌都相關姓氏所載入墾年代地史料及所使用方言等資訊,以釐清饒北地區宗族的歷史地理脈絡。利用閩、客式地名,作為劃分饒平閩、客歷史方言區界線的操作型定義,以釐清饒平裔宗族在清代渡臺之初的閩、客族群屬性的歸屬。比較饒平閩、客歷史方言界線與現今饒平方言界線發現,這兩條方言界線相去不遠,在研究實務上顯示,本研究所設計的歷史方言界線具有很好的參考價值。此外,研究發現在饒北地區,某些宗族以「寧化石壁」作為祖居地的說詞,可能是虛構的宗族遷徙史;也就是說,以「寧化石壁」作為辨識客家的指標,必須針對個別宗族的情況逐一檢核,方可確定。
  • Item
    現象學地理學--存在空間的一個詮釋
    (中國地理學會, 1991-07-01) 潘朝陽
  • Item
    地理學與人文關懷 
    (國立臺灣師範大學, 1988-04-01) 潘朝陽
  • Item
    地理學方法論中的非實證論傳統
    (國立臺灣師範大學地理學系, 1987-03-01) 潘朝陽
    Traditionally, geography has always been regarded as a branch of the so-called “positive science”, and as such geography is held to abide by such rigorous scientific inference procedures as hypothesis, collection; evaluation; and analysis of data; verification, establishment of model, and consequently forecasting based on conclusion. Geography derived accordingly is referred to as ‘scientific geography’, the philosophy underlying known as ‘positivism’. The progress of natural sciences which has been advancing vehemently in our times has considerable impacts on the philosophy, since the 19th century positivism has become an emerging trend for methodology, calling for the application of natural sciencse, mathematical and physical models to the study of social phenomena with a view to find out universal law accountable for all that is seen and that which prevails in the cultural and social phenomena everywhere worlwide. Way back following World War II, especially during the 60's and the 70’s, Geography for study has been deeply influenced by theories like positivism and logical positivism, a lot of spatial scientifically oriented theses on the subject of geography came up one after the other, with strong backgrounds of math and physics, especially geometrical spirits, as reflected in the points, segments of line, and surfaces characterising geographical settings. As a matter of fact, there is an ab-positivism philosophy which has been prevailing and outstanding enough in the tradition of the evolution of history, be it ‘Romanticism", “Neo-Kantianism”, “Historicism”, they altogether run contrary to “Naturalism”, “Materialism”, “Empiricism”, and even “Positivism”, any that which favors “Mechanism”, they opposed researching, handling of cultural and social issues by means of natural science in one way or another, but instead they advocated “cultural historical sciences”, with stresses given to humanitarian value, individual meaningfulness, and as such they can hardly agree with the pursuit of the so-called “universal law”, they proposed instead that the target set for humanitarian and sociological subjects should be to uphold the meaing of “human being”. In as early as days when Ritter became prominent, for geography a branch of study, methodology, unrelated to positivism, has been established, in particular a series of geographic thoughts including those propounded by Schlüter-Carl Sauer, Paul Vidal de la Blache, Hettner-Hartshorne, were aimed at illustrating the meaning of “Regional Uniqueness” through interpretative expression the philosophy behind all these is obviously other than positivistic in nature. In short, their philosophy openly and unanimously oppose the pursuit of a universal Jaw as the goal for geography, and prefer to interprete the meaning of Regional uniqueness by means of the structure and evolution of the heritage of the culture and historical contexts. The philosophical influence of Neo-Kantianism, Historicism, and even Ro­manticism call be found by means of their methodology.
  • Item
    觀念論地理學
    (國立臺灣師範大學地理學系, 1989-03-01) 潘朝陽
    As a important branch of Humanistic Geography, Idealist Geography focuses on the interpretation of human's thought within the geographical phenomena and the understanding of the context of culture-history, and through this way to indicate the meaning and value of geographical phenomena. Idealist Geographer must have sufficient cultural-historical and thoughtful-minded cultivation, because only through them, he or she then has a more deep and thorough under-standing for the regions and geographical phenomena he or she approaches, and only through them, he or she is then able to give humanistic criticism and attention to the nature of approach subjects, and this kind of criticism and attention is just the most fundamental spirit should be possessed by all the idealist geographers and humanistic geographers. This article enumerates three idealist masters, W. Windelband, H. Rickert and R.G. Colling-wood, and construes their ideas that study for human world shall set out from the understand-ing of culture-history and thought-mind. Further, the author touches on Paul Vidal de la Blache's "Genre de vie" to indicate the spirit of idealist has sufficed in the tradition of geography and needed not to take from outside, since the methodology of Genre de vie is through the understanding for one region's culture虐istory, thought-mind to grasp the uniqueness of the region. Besides, the author also analyzes and points out two Taiwan's geographers' essays in order to indicate the methodology of idealist geography, more or less, has been practically approaches. If examining carefully, we somewhat also can find the contents of idealist geography existed in other geographers' articles.
  • Item
    地理學與人文關懷 
    (教育部人文及社會學科教育指導委員會, 1990-06-01) 潘朝陽
  • Item
    由老子思想論地理學觀 
    (國立臺灣師範大學文學院, 1985-06-01) 潘朝陽
  • Item
    識覺及認知 
    (國立臺灣師範大學地理系學會, 1986-06-01) 歐陽鍾玲
  • Item
    洪堡德所奠立之地理學的一種美學傳統
    (地理學系, 2005-11-??) 池永歆
    地理學界對亞歷山大.馮.洪堡德(Alexander von Humboldt、1769-1859)思想學說的關注,常以作為地理學思想史上的洪堡德而認識他。在論及洪堡德的地理學思想史的專著中,例如哈特向 (Hartshorne)的《地理學的性質》(The Nature of Geography)、狄克生(Dickinson)所撰之《現代地理學的創建者》(The Makers of Modern Geography)或者是詹姆士(James)與馬丁(Martin)所撰寫的《大千世界:地理學理念史》(All Possible World:A History of Geographical Ideas),咸認洪堡德是一位具備博學知識的博物學家以及現代地理學的奠基者、創建人,對許多領域均有豐碩的貢獻。論及洪堡德對地理學的看法,通常包 括:他對系統地理學(systematic geography)發展的貢獻、根據區域現象之相互關聯的整體研究而對個別區域做解釋性描述,以及他強調人是自然的一部分與自然具有合諧與統一性的觀點 (Hartshorne,1939: 78-79、Dickinson、1969、James與Martin,1993: 112-126)等等。 洪堡德的著作對19世紀的影響,擴及許多科學研究的領域,包括:地質學、地球物理學、地理學與生物學等;例如,達爾文(Charles Darwin、1809-1882)在1881年一封給虎克(Hooker)的信中,就形容洪堡德為「曾經存在之最偉大的科學旅行者」(the greatest scientific traveler who ever lived)。當達爾文乘坐獵犬號從事科學探險時,隨身攜帶洪堡德的著作,後來並回憶到這些洪堡德的著作改變他一生的整個過程 (Richards,2003: 92-93)。 美國文學家愛默生(Ralph Waldo Emerson、1803-1882)在洪堡德100歲冥誕時(1869年),曾著專文將其描述為「世界的奇才之一,就像亞里斯多德、就像凱 薩......,他不時地出現,彷彿向我們展現人類理智的潛在價值----一位博學多才的人(a universal man)......。」這位「博學多才的人」的知性遺產(intellectual legacy),對當代人文主義地理學(humanistic geography)的研究具有啟迪作用,這些在人文主義地理學的奠立者段義孚(Yi-Fu Tuan)如下的論述中可清楚地見到(Tuan,1999: 86): 亞歷山大.馮.洪堡德對我來說是一個英雄,有著明顯的理由。他是現代自然地理學的奠基者,而我做為一名自然地理學者開始我的事業。他對於地理學的探索史做 了出眾的貢獻,並是最先運用景觀畫與詩歌以延伸地理經驗範圍的其中一位----感情、情緒與概念----這些構成人文主義地理學的領域,是我成年歲月的知 性焦點。