教育學系

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/15

教育學系創於民國35年,是國立臺灣師範大學創校初期七系之一,迄今將屆七十年,期間組織與課程歷經變動,目前採行一系兩所之制運作。

教育學系創設之初,學制上只設大學部五年制學士班(含實習一年),招收本地生,之後增班並收海外僑生,主要來自港澳韓馬等地。另先後設有一年制及三年制教育專修科,自50年起增設夜間部六年制(含實習)學士班,至68年師範教育法公布實施後,改辦進修部三年制及四年制學師班招收現職教師,直至七十年代末。

至於研究所,民國44年單獨設立教育研究所碩士班,61年增設博士班,並開辦暑期教師碩士四十學分班。

民國76年配合學校行政組調整,系所合一。83年以後,再配合大學法修正,更名為教育學系,分設學士班、碩士班、博士班。另開辦暑期、夜間及週末等教育行政及學校行政碩士在職專班。為因應學術日趨分化專精,92年先行設立教育政策與行政研究所碩士班,98年再設立課程與教學研究所碩、博士班。為有效整合人力物力資源,自100年起推動「系所合一、一系二所」政策,系所務順利運作迄今。

本學系與教育研究所位址數經遷移,初創時,教育學系設於本部校區。後與研究所分設於圖書館校區舊圖書館兩側(今博愛大樓)。後教育系遷入舊教育大樓(今進修推廣學院),而教育研究所則於61年遷入公館校區研究大樓三樓(今數學系館)。77年新教育學院大樓落成,教育系及教育研究所一併遷入三、八、九樓。

本系所教師專長涵蓋教育哲學、教育史、教育社會學、教育行政、教育政策、課程與教學等主要領域,歷來學術表現傑出。早期有田培林、楊亮功、劉季洪、黃建中、王文俊、林本、余書麟、孫亢曾等名師執教。之後獲教育部學術獎者有程石泉、伍振鷟、黃政傑、楊深坑等諸師,兩度獲教育部國家講座者為楊深坑教授。另獲國科會傑出獎者有歐陽教、簡茂發、謝文全、楊深坑等諸師。另有賈馥茗、伍振鷟、歐陽教、謝文全、吳清基及簡茂發諸師,先後獲聘為名譽教授。有關行政服務上,郭為藩、林清江及吳清基三師先後擔任教育部部長,而系友多人歷任教育部司處長或地方教育廳、局、處首長,或擔任大專院校或中小學校長、主任。

至於本系所整體表現,據英國高等教育調查機構QS公司公布「全球大學30個學科領域排名」,本校102年時教育學科排名首度獲評為第50名,103年晉升至42名,104年更躍升至22名,成績備受國際肯定。

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    Evidence-based Guidance of "Taiwan Health Promoting School"Promotional Strategy & Result of Second-Generation Health Promotion
    (2012-10-31) Liu, Chieh-Hsing; Chang Tzu-Chau; Liao Li-Ling; Chang Fong-ching; Cheng Chi-chia; Niu Yu- Zhen; Chou, Hsin-Pei
    Through policy support, cross-agency partnership, and bottom-up comprehensive counseling the Ministry of Education began promoting evidence-based guidance for the second-generation Health Promoting School. The purpose is to help local governments and schools in improving the student health conditions and in creating a healthy lifestyle, and to participate in the process comprehensively. The important results are four thousand two hundred eighteen high schools, middle schools, and elementary schools participated in the Health Promoting School initiative. One hundred and one school principals, directors, and teachers participated as counselors in the schools within cities and counties. In addition to the self-efficacy for the schools promoting the project, the schools had expressed their satisfaction and willingness to continue with the initiative. One hundred action-research programs were created and visitors to the online learning platform have exceeded the millions, as an indicator of resource integration. International conferences on the results of Health Promoting School has given recognition for the local governments' and schools' concrete effort on promoting healthy behavior in school, and align them with international standards. The success of health-promoting schools in Taiwan lies in the integration of health and educational resources, as well as the establishment of partnerships. Central and local government units, community organizations, parent groups, counselors, and schools alike support one another as they all value health and acknowledge the ideals of “health-promoting schools”. Let us continue our efforts for the health of our future generations.
  • Item
    A study about effectiveness of the health promoting schools supporting network on schools' self-efficacy in Taiwan
    (2012-10-31) Liao Li-Ling; Liu Chieh-Hsing; Chang Fong-ching; Cheng Chi-chia J.; Niu Yu- Zhen
    Taiwan launched the “Health-Promoting School Program” in 2001, and has established and provided a supporting network system to schools at various levels. This supporting network includes professional support for guidance teams and administrative support from governmental units. This study aims to discuss the effectiveness of such supporting network system to the self-efficacy of schools while carrying out the Health-Promoting School Program. As a cross-sectional study, the target population is staff involved in the Health-Promoting School Program from all junior high schools and elementary schools in Taiwan. Stratified systematic sampling design was employed based on junior high schools or elementary schools, counties or cities, and school size etc., and probability proportional to size (PPS) was used at each stratum. A total of 800 schools were sampled and a total of 621 valid questionnaires were received, giving a receiving rate of 77.63%. As revealed from results of stepwise regression analysis, age of research subjects, subjects' relationship with guidance teams, and satisfaction of policies and resources had significant predictability to subjects' efficacy while carrying out the Health-Promoting School Program (total variance 23.2%, p<0.001). The satisfaction of policies and resources was found with the best predictability with variance of 16.9%. This study showed that the health-promoting school supporting network gives a positive impact to efficacy of executing the Health-Promoting School Program. Effort should be placed to strengthen the relationship between guidance teams and schools, and improve each school's satisfaction about relative policies and resources.