宋代老子學「以佛解《老》」析論

Simple item page
dc.contributor.author江淑君zh_tw
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-27T15:42:57Z
dc.date.available2014-10-27T15:42:57Z
dc.date.issued2006-03-??zh_TW
dc.description.abstract宋代 ; 老子學 ; 以佛解老 ; 蘇轍 ; 王雱 ; 葛長庚zh_tw
dc.description.abstractThe Sung dynasty ; Taoism ; To interpret Taoism by Buddhism ; Su Che ; Wang Fang ; Ge Chang-gengen_US
dc.identifierD8208A04-226C-DBDE-697E-9279D16D8B69zh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/25057
dc.language中文zh_TW
dc.publisher國文學系zh_tw
dc.publisherDepartment of Chinese, NTNUen_US
dc.relation(28（春季號）)，67-100zh_TW
dc.relation.ispartof中國學術年刊zh_tw
dc.subject.other繼唐代「重玄學」之後zh_tw
dc.subject.other「以佛解《老》」所積澱形成的這股熱潮zh_tw
dc.subject.other在宋代並未有稍退的跡象zh_tw
dc.subject.other儒家士大夫zh_tw
dc.subject.other道士zh_tw
dc.subject.other佛教徒zh_tw
dc.subject.other皇帝臣相等不同身分的人zh_tw
dc.subject.other無不受此風氣影響。因為《老子》的言簡意賅zh_tw
dc.subject.other最可容許後人各引一端zh_tw
dc.subject.other以自成其說。因此zh_tw
dc.subject.other理析這些老學研究者們「如何以佛教的觀點閱讀《老子》？」應是一個值得認真鈎稽的論題。宋人注《老》中zh_tw
dc.subject.other「以佛解《老》」的義理趨向zh_tw
dc.subject.other主要表現在兩方面：其一是直接以摘句的方式zh_tw
dc.subject.other徵引佛典文獻詮解《老子》。被援用的佛典zh_tw
dc.subject.other諸如《首楞嚴經》zh_tw
dc.subject.other《金剛般若波羅蜜經》zh_tw
dc.subject.other《六祖壇經》zh_tw
dc.subject.other《般若波羅蜜多心經》等多處可見。其間如何互訓zh_tw
dc.subject.other藉以達到佛zh_tw
dc.subject.other老會通的目的zh_tw
dc.subject.other頗值得關注。其二則是援引佛教專屬的概念命題zh_tw
dc.subject.other術語與老子學說相附會。本文茲以「空」zh_tw
dc.subject.other「真空」zh_tw
dc.subject.other「妄想」zh_tw
dc.subject.other「分別」等佛教概念為代表zh_tw
dc.subject.other說明其間如何與老子思想相證解的概況。此外zh_tw
dc.subject.other零星使用的辭彙更是不勝枚舉zh_tw
dc.subject.other諸如「無我」zh_tw
dc.subject.other「真常」zh_tw
dc.subject.other「無相」zh_tw
dc.subject.other「六入」zh_tw
dc.subject.other「中道」zh_tw
dc.subject.other「不二法門」zh_tw
dc.subject.other「生滅」zh_tw
dc.subject.other「無著」zh_tw
dc.subject.other「無念」zh_tw
dc.subject.other「無染」zh_tw
dc.subject.other「無住」zh_tw
dc.subject.other「法界」等佛教用語在《老子》注語中亦不時出現。相關論點的闡釋zh_tw
dc.subject.other希望對於宋代老子學中「以佛解《老》」的老學特徵zh_tw
dc.subject.other能有更充分的證成與發揮。zh_tw
dc.subject.otherThe philosophical trend had turned to metaphysics since the Tang Dynasty and developed to an approach that tried to interpret Taoism by Buddhism in the Sung Dynasty. The text of Lao Tze is simple but implies profound meaning. Everyone can cite authorities to make his comments on this classic. Scholars of the Sung Dynasty inclined to study Lao Tze from the aspect of Buddhism in two ways. On one handen_US
dc.subject.otherthey would quote the Buddhism sutra directlyen_US
dc.subject.othersuch as The Shurangama Sutraen_US
dc.subject.otherThe Vajra Prajna Paramita Sutraen_US
dc.subject.otherThe Sutra Preached by the Sixth Patriarch Huenengen_US
dc.subject.otherand Prajna Paramita Hear Sutra. On the other handen_US
dc.subject.otherthey would refer to the Buddhism conceptsen_US
dc.subject.otherpropositions and terminology and applied them to the theory of Taoism. This article discusses how the Buddhism concepts such as “emptiness”en_US
dc.subject.other“the real emptiness”en_US
dc.subject.other“illusion” and “discrimination” were used by the scholars in the Sung Dynasty to support the ideas implied in Lao Tze. The author also gives some examples of Buddhism terminology such as “non-ego”en_US
dc.subject.other“constancy”en_US
dc.subject.other“without form”en_US
dc.subject.other“six entrances”en_US
dc.subject.other“the middle way”en_US
dc.subject.other“the unique door to enlightenment”en_US
dc.subject.other“birth and decease”en_US
dc.subject.other“without clinging”en_US
dc.subject.other“without remembrance”en_US
dc.subject.other“without catch”en_US
dc.subject.other“impermanent”and “the Dharm Realm” that were frequently cited in the commentary of Lao Tze to illustrate the characteristics of philosophical trend in this period.en_US
dc.title宋代老子學「以佛解《老》」析論zh-tw

Files

Collections

中國學術年刊