衝擊與想像：對實踐網球球質深度的追尋

Abstract

回顧網球的生涯一直在追求球質感，現今因為有體育系博士生和網球教練的雙重身分，所以對於球質感的相關運動科學理論知識取得相對一般人來的容易，但每天身處在網球實踐場域的我，發現網球球質的探索不能僅靠運動科學理論詮釋，因為在實踐網球球質經驗中，還牽涉很多可以說出來，又或者不知名的感受。這些實踐網球球質經驗主要藉由法國哲學家梅洛龐蒂的深度哲學，將這些球質經驗給形塑出來。本研究目的為實踐網球球質深度的探索、反思選手時期、科學概念、哲學概念、網球教練概念下的球質觀。研究結果發現如下：從科學球質的實踐反思首先為聯想球質的刺激、其次是科學球質的宰制、最後是球質文化給予的束縛。而以教練球質深度的反思與建議為：首先應注重科學模式外的實踐球質、其次是適時跳脫文化的束縛、第三是新媒體球質的溝通、第四是球質的競技有效性測試、第五是空白的球質技術教學、第六為創發球質技術演化的場域、最後是超越時空、社交的球質關係。研究結論為：首先球質是開放且相對的關係、其次是球質是多樣綜合且連結的關係、接著是球質是文化亦是新媒體的、最後球質是競技有效的；從存有學的立場來說，發現球質是過程且不斷演化的和球質是網球世界的本源。從自我擊球感的角度來看，球質是一種流變與可逆的關係。最後上述所勾勒出來的實踐球質深度經驗的結構，其實僅是片面的球質，只是某個時空背景下的球質，不會是完全的球質，因為球質深度是一種事物間交纏可逆的流變關係，不會僅是那麼清楚明白的結構關係。所以對我來說球質的本源都來自真實世界的給出，而打球的人、教球的人、看球的人都是以他自己的方式和世界周旋。Reviewing the tennis career of pursuing the ball quality, I have relatively easy access to the theoretical knowledge of sports science related to ball quality because of my dual identity of being a Ph.D. student and a tennis coach. However, I find that the exploration of the tennis ball quality can be interpreted not only by theories of sport sciences but also by the in-expressible feelings from the daily practice of ball quality on the tennis field. These practical experiences of ball quality come mainly from Merleau-Ponty’s concept of depth. Thus, the purpose of the study is to explore the depth of tennis ball quality and reflect on the concept of ball quality from the initial player period to the current coach period through my scientific and philosophical concepts.Results: From the scientific reflection of ball quality, the first concerns the stimulation of associating with the ball quality. The second suggests the domination of the scientific discourse on the ball quality. The last indicates the bondage given by the culture of ball quality. Reflections and suggestions: One shall (1) pay attention to the practice of ball quality beyond the scientific model, (2) timely escape from the bondage of culture, (3) focus on the communication of the ball quality through new media, (4) test the competitive effectiveness of ball quality, (5) value the technical teaching of the null ball quality, (6) innovate the field of evolution of ball quality, and finally (7) go beyond the relationship between the ball quality and time and space. Conclusions: First, the ball quality is open and relative. Second, it is diverse, comprehensively connected, cultural and new media. Finally, the ball quality is competitive and effective. From the standpoint of ontology, the ball quality is a process and constantly evolving, and it suggests the origin of the tennis world. From my viewpoint of hitting the ball, ball quality is becoming and reversible relationship.Finally, the structure of the depth experience depicted above addresses only a partial aspect of ball quality, or at a certain moment, which is never complete. As the depth of ball quality is a reversible relation interlaced with things of becoming, it will not be a complete structural relation. The origin of ball quality comes primarily from the giving of the real world. Hence, the players, instructors, and the audiences are those who deal with the world in their own manners.