教師著作

Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/31276

Browse

Subject: search.filters.subject.E-learning

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    A learning style classification mechanism for e-learning
    (Elsevier, 2009-09-01) Chang, Yi-Chun; Kao, Wen-Yan; Chu, Chih-Ping; Chiu, Chiung-Hui
    With the growing demand in e-learning, numerous research works have been done to enhance teaching quality in e-learning environments. Among these studies, researchers have indicated that adaptive learning is a critical requirement for promoting the learning performance of students. Adaptive learning provides adaptive learning materials, learning strategies and/or courses according to a student’s learning style. Hence, the first step for achieving adaptive learning environments is to identify students’ learning styles. This paper proposes a learning style classification mechanism to classify and then identify students’ learning styles. The proposed mechanism improves k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) classification and combines it with genetic algorithms (GA). To demonstrate the viability of the proposed mechanism, the proposed mechanism is implemented on an open-learning management system. The learning behavioral features of 117 elementary school students are collected and then classified by the proposed mechanism. The experimental results indicate that the proposed classification mechanism can effectively classify and identify students’ learning styles.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    數位學習服務品質之評鑑與落差探討
    (2007-12-01) 陳明溥; 張國恩; Chen, Ming-puu; Chang, Kuo-en
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    數位學習服務品質之評鑑與落差探討
    (中國視聽教育學會, 2007-12-01) 陳明溥; 張國恩
    「數位學習服務品質認證」是「數位學習國家型科技計畫」為確保各項數位學習計畫之學習內涵與品質，所開發之品質評鑑架構與服務。「數位學習服務品質認證」是以實施或提供數位學習服務之機構為評鑑對象，透過評鑑架構系統性地檢視數位學習服務機構在人員、課程、及系統等三個學習服務品質面向的表現，並據以授予品質標章，以鼓勵及推廣優質數位學習服務。本研究透過「數位學習服務品質規範」之探討，檢視數位學習服務之品質評鑑架構、內涵與定位，並經由數位學習服務品質認證 (1.04版) 案例之品質表現與自我評鑑之落差分析，檢視數位學習服務機構對於數位學習服務品質標準之看法與問題。研究結果顯示，數位學習服務品質評鑑之系統架構具適切的結構效度；而由個案品質表現之落差分析則發現申請機構傾向於高估其數位學習服務之品質。研究建議 (a)「數位學習服務品質認證」在評鑑重點上應調整“檢核重點之最低通過等級為其認證等級”之評鑑方式，重新聚焦於“品質規範”層面，以期能提供更具彈性與更真實呈現數位學習服務的品質；(b)後續仍有賴品質認證中心提供適切的推廣與訓練活動，以縮減數位學習服務機構對於服務品質標準認知上的落差；(c)「數位學習服務品質認證」應建立客觀且系統性的評量與檢驗機制，以維護並提升品質認證之客觀性與適用性。