莊子、向郭與支遁之逍遙觀試析

Simple item page
dc.contributor國立臺灣師範大學國文學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.author沈維華zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-17T08:49:52Z
dc.date.available2015-11-17T08:49:52Z
dc.date.issued1998-03-01
dc.description.abstract莊子哲學可以逍遙二字貫通之。何謂逍遙﹖歷來學者詮釋不一。本文先分別以「無待無為」、「適性」、「即色義」來揭示莊子、向郭、支遁三家之逍遙觀。再進而比較三者之關係，從中探討以下兩個問題: 一是向郭逍遙義能否真的相應莊子之旨趣﹖一是支遁的逍遙義真能取代向郭之原注嗎﹖希望藉由對原典的解讀與理解，能對逍遙義有較周全的認識。綜觀莊子、向郭與支遁三家之逍遙義，儘管其觀點不一，然卻有其共通之處，即是惟有在無待境地上的聖人，才稱得上真正的逍遙。zh_TW
dc.identifierntnulib_tp_B0148_01_001
dc.identifier.issn1021-7851
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/75595
dc.languagezh_TW
dc.publisher國立臺灣師範大學國文研究所zh_TW
dc.relation中國學術年刊，19，145-160、677-678。zh_TW
dc.subject.other逍遙zh_TW
dc.subject.other莊子zh_TW
dc.subject.other向郭zh_TW
dc.subject.other支遁zh_TW
dc.subject.other無待zh_TW
dc.subject.other無為zh_TW
dc.subject.other適性zh_TW
dc.subject.other即色義zh_TW
dc.subject.otherHsiao yaoen_US
dc.subject.otherEnjoy a free and easy lifeen_US
dc.subject.otherChuang Tzuen_US
dc.subject.otherHsiang Kuoen_US
dc.subject.otherChih tunen_US
dc.subject.otherNon-egotismen_US
dc.subject.otherAbandon self-assertion preserve a tranquil mind and there will be no opposition between self and othersen_US
dc.subject.otherInactionen_US
dc.subject.otherFollow the nature The connotation of outward appearance and emptinessen_US
dc.title莊子、向郭與支遁之逍遙觀試析zh_TW
dc.titleAnalysis of the Concept of Hsiao Yao by Chuang Tzu, Hsiang Kuo and Chih Tunen_US

Files

Collections

教師著作