Evaluating proposals for experiments: An application of Web-based self- and peer-assessment

dc.contributor國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系zh_tw
dc.contributor.authorSung, Y. T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, C. S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, C. L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, K. E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-02T06:38:43Z
dc.date.available2014-12-02T06:38:43Z
dc.date.issued2003-09-01zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThirty-four undergraduates used Web-based self- and peer-assessment procedures for evaluating proposals in experimental psychology courses. Students presented their proposals and commented on the proposals of others on the Web. Results indicated that proposal observation and peer interaction enhanced the quality of students' proposals. These procedures also enhanced the interrater reliability of within-group members' proposal ratings.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/S15328023TOP3004_06zh_TW
dc.identifierntnulib_tp_A0201_01_009zh_TW
dc.identifier.issn0098-6283zh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/40676
dc.languageen_USzh_TW
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.relationTeaching of Psychology, 30, 331-334.en_US
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP3004_06zh_TW
dc.titleEvaluating proposals for experiments: An application of Web-based self- and peer-assessmenten_US

Files

Collections