空間的「視」與「識」─ 簡佑任創作研究
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2022
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
本論文以「視」與「識」出發,試圖從現象學方法中「『可見性』的『視』與『不可見性』的『識』」探索「空間」的潛在意義與藝術創作中「空間裝置」的美學意涵。本論文共分為五個章節:在第一章「緒論」的部分,筆者簡述了自身的研究動機、目的、方法與範圍,並概略地對本論文所涉及的相關名詞進行釋義。第二章「學理依據」的部分,筆者試圖勾勒空間現象學的輪廓,試圖理解「空間」在「可見性」外「不可見性」的潛在面向,並將巴舍拉「家屋」的「幸福空間」與傅柯「全景敞視監獄」的「敵意空間」進行比較。第三章「空間裝置的『視』與『識』」的部分,筆者以「可見性」與「不可見性」的視角對「空間裝置」進行探究。此章節以「現成物」的觀念出發,爬梳現象學與低限主義之間的關係,進而探索「水墨」和「媒材」、「空間裝置」之間的關係與展現。第四章「創作實踐與作品分析」,筆者探討了自身創作中「家屋」、「水泥」、「舉牌工人肖像計劃」三個系列。透過創作形式的分析與自身理念的表述,回應筆者三個系列中「家屋」、「廢墟」、「監視」三者之空間意向。最後,在第五章「結論」的部分,筆者總結本論文所探討的核心內容並展望自身未來的創作與研究。
This research paper begins with “seeing” and “perceiving” and attempts to explore the underlying meaning of space and the aesthetic connotations in artistic “spatial installations” through the phenomenological methods of “seeing” in “visibility” and “perceiving” in “invisibility.” This paper is structured into five chapters:The first chapter “Introduction” elaborates on the research motivation, goal, methodology, and scope of research, and gives brief definitions of the terminology that are used in the paper.The second chapter “Academic Basis” examines the outlines of spatial phenomenology and attempts to understand the underlying aspects of “invisibility” that exist outside the “visibility” of “space” and compares the “felicitous space” in Gaston Bachelard’s “house” and the “hostile design” in Foucault’s “panopticon.”In the third chapter “‘seeing’ and ‘perceiving’ in Spatial Installations,” this paper explores “spatial installation” from the perspective of “visibility” and “invisibility.” The chapter begins with the concept of “readymades” and investigates the relationship between phenomenology and Minimalism to further examine the connection and presentation of “ink,” “material,” and “spatial installation.”The fourth chapter “Creative Practices and Artwork Analysis” looks at three works series: House, Concrete, and Workers Holding Placards. The analysis of creative form and discourses on the artist’s personal beliefs responds to the spatial connotations of “house,” “ruins,” and “surveillance” in the series.Finally, the fifth chapter “Conclusion” concludes the core contents of this paper and looks toward future works and research.
This research paper begins with “seeing” and “perceiving” and attempts to explore the underlying meaning of space and the aesthetic connotations in artistic “spatial installations” through the phenomenological methods of “seeing” in “visibility” and “perceiving” in “invisibility.” This paper is structured into five chapters:The first chapter “Introduction” elaborates on the research motivation, goal, methodology, and scope of research, and gives brief definitions of the terminology that are used in the paper.The second chapter “Academic Basis” examines the outlines of spatial phenomenology and attempts to understand the underlying aspects of “invisibility” that exist outside the “visibility” of “space” and compares the “felicitous space” in Gaston Bachelard’s “house” and the “hostile design” in Foucault’s “panopticon.”In the third chapter “‘seeing’ and ‘perceiving’ in Spatial Installations,” this paper explores “spatial installation” from the perspective of “visibility” and “invisibility.” The chapter begins with the concept of “readymades” and investigates the relationship between phenomenology and Minimalism to further examine the connection and presentation of “ink,” “material,” and “spatial installation.”The fourth chapter “Creative Practices and Artwork Analysis” looks at three works series: House, Concrete, and Workers Holding Placards. The analysis of creative form and discourses on the artist’s personal beliefs responds to the spatial connotations of “house,” “ruins,” and “surveillance” in the series.Finally, the fifth chapter “Conclusion” concludes the core contents of this paper and looks toward future works and research.
Description
Keywords
空間, 家屋, 記憶, 全景敞視監獄, 水墨裝置, space, house, memory, panopticon, ink installation